Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television

Nomination of Bleach season 2 for featured list removal

I have nominated Bleach season 2 for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Bleach season 3 has also been nominated for featured list removal; you are encouraged to join the discussion. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:30, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Bleach season 4 has also been nominated for featured list removal; you are encouraged to join the discussion. RunningTiger123 (talk) 22:39, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Bleach season 5 has also been nominated for featured list removal; you are encouraged to join the discussion. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:51, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Bleach season 6 has also been nominated for featured list removal; you are encouraged to join the discussion. RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:55, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Bleach season 7 has also been nominated for featured list removal; you are encouraged to join the discussion. RunningTiger123 (talk) 00:49, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Bleach season 8 has also been nominated for featured list removal; you are encouraged to join the discussion. RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:46, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Simpsons season 36 issue

I am trying to mediate a dispute at DRN concerning The Simpsons season 36. There were four episodes which were broadcast on Disney+ rather than the usual network coverage on Fox. The question has to do with the formatting of the table of episodes, and whether the Disney episodes should be listed separately in the table of episodes, or whether they should be listed in chronological sequence along with the regular episodes.

Thank you for any guidance. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:45, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

I immediately thought of the Bionic Woman which changed networks in season 3. Agree with Bionic Woman formatting ... just continue the list without special mention of Disney +.Phatblackmama (talk) 02:08, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

I agree that the episodes should be listed in chronological sequence along with the regular episodes. I think to List of South Park episodes, which includes special releases on another network to the main series. While those particular episodes are specials and not released/aired during the airing of any particular season, they are still listed chronologically, rather than grouped together outside of the main series in some separate specials section. -- Alex_21 _TALK 23:42, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

@Robert McClenon Pinging you, in case you din't see this. Cheers. -- Alex_21 _TALK 23:49, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

To be fair, the South Park episodes are both listed chronologically and grouped together outside the main series (even in a separate table in their case), which is possible due to their airdates. U-Mos (talk) 16:05, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Disney+ episodes are regulars, nothing to doing, everything is fine. Lado85 (talk) 05:13, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Obviously everything is not fine, else you wouldn't be at DRN. Please keep dispute comments at DRN; I was simply providing an opinion here. -- Alex_21 _TALK 06:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

That's fair. Even if they were aired during a season, I'd recommend keep it chronological in the table, and maybe set the episode number (within the season) as "–", much like how we do it with Doctor Who specials (e.g. "The Snowmen"). Would that be an acceptable compromise? -- Alex_21 _TALK 07:01, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

They have regular episodes numbers, overall and in season. This episodes are in-season specials like Treehouse of Horror. Only difference is broadcast network. I think in season number can be changed as "–", but not overall. Lado85 (talk) 08:00, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

"Treehouse of Horror" are Halloween-themed episodes, not special releases. Special releases constitute non-regular/non-season episodes, such as Christmas specials in Doctor Who or the Paramount+ episodes in South Park. Keeping the overall numbers but blanking the season numbers would be in form with the two examples given. -- Alex_21 _TALK 21:44, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:List of Disney+ Hotstar original programming#Requested move 14 February 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:List of Disney+ Hotstar original programming#Requested move 14 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:29, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Draft

I am working on a draft of an episode article. I want to get it to mainspace-quality but I need the help of someone that has experience doing this. This is my first article and I'd really appreciate all the help I can get. Ladtrack (talk) 21:08, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Invincible season article

Invincible season 2 has recently been accepted at AFC, splitting off from Invincible (TV series), but I don't believe it conforms with our TVSPLIT standards. Thoughts? -- Alex_21 _TALK 21:23, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Content seems rather decent at a first glance in terms of it not being a direct duplication, but it also seems to lack depth (it's all surface info). If all content was merged into the parent article, it would seem to be ~40kb, placing it a tad lower than what we traditionally expect before splitting. I assume in a case like this a split to an LoE page (when conditions are met) first would be more useful than a season split. Season articles do come first occasionally, but I'm not necessarily seeing enough to warrant that here (yet). TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:19, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Agreed. It doesn't provide anything that the parent article doesn't. A split to an LoE would definitely be more helpful here. I'd recommend that this article is moved back to the draftspace. -- Alex_21 _TALK 09:06, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

@Alex 21 @TheDoctorWho I strongly disagree with the decision to move the article because its content is significantly different from that of the parent article. There is valuable information in this article that is not present in the parent article, such as the music section, guest cast, and additional details. It also highlights several notable actors and musicians who are not mentioned in the parent article, which is an essential aspect that should not be overlooked. Furthermore, this season is a highly notable one in the series, and moving it back to the draft space is entirely unwarranted. Afro 📢Talk! 09:33, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

No one is saying the unique information in the season article should be deleted, just moved into the series article until the time is right for a split. I agree with the others that the current season article is weak and needs improvement to be kept in the mainspace. If you are confident that the season is noteworthy enough for its own article, you can prove it by expanding the article with more production and reception information. - adamstom97 (talk) 10:04, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Would be doing that @Adamstom.97 Afro 📢Talk! 10:06, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

@Alex 21@Adamstom.97@TheDoctorWho The article has significantly improved and is now well-detailed. Afro 📢Talk! 12:37, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

I agree that this article is now in a much better state and should exist as an individual article. Good job @Afrowriter! -- Alex_21 _TALK 23:44, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Pinkie Pride

Pinkie Pride has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/it/other neos • talk • edits) 11:41, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

John Cochran (Survivor contestant) re-nominated for deletion

Link: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Cochran (Survivor contestant) (2nd nomination). George Ho (talk) 16:13, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Drew Carey

Drew Carey has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:47, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:News Nation#Requested move 7 February 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:News Nation#Requested move 7 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 12:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

End dates in television infobox

I've noticed there has been an update to {{End date}}, in that we cannot use {{End date|present}} in {{Infobox television}} or {{Infobox television season}} anymore. This is the edit being performed, to prevent this error (scroll down to the bottom of the infobox). This is likely fixable with AWB. -- Alex_21 _TALK 01:01, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Category:Videographies has been nominated for discussion

Category:Videographies, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.

There is concern that the category name uses an invented neologism that isn't used outside Wikipedia and doesn't reflect the scope of the article Videography. Apparently, various articles with the name were also moved by the nominator without any discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:48, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Blue Bloods (TV series)#Requested move 21 February 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Blue Bloods (TV series)#Requested move 21 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 12:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Big Man on Hippocampus

Big Man on Hippocampus has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:17, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Friends

Friends has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:19, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:No Time to Spy: A Loud House Movie#Requested move 6 February 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:No Time to Spy: A Loud House Movie#Requested move 6 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 16:51, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Strange New Worlds

I am proposing that Strange New Worlds (Star Trek: Strange New Worlds) be merged into Star Trek: Strange New Worlds season 1. The merge discussion can be found at Talk:Strange New Worlds (Star Trek: Strange New Worlds)#Merge proposal. Thanks, adamstom97 (talk) 15:25, 6 March 2025 (UTC)